LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L Archives

CASLL-L Archives


CASLL-L@LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L Home

CASLL-L  May 2007

CASLL-L May 2007

Subject:

Re: Arguing that Plagiarism is an Ineffective tool

From:

Catherine Schryer <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CASLL/Inkshed <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 14 May 2007 14:58:19 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (133 lines)

Hi Russ

No I did not write this document and the originial writer's name was 
supposed to remain with it. In fact, I argued that it would be a case of 
plagiarism if my name appeared with the document. I will see to it that my 
name is removed.
We have just had  a big re-organization here and somebody probably just got 
enthusiastic.

As for the orginal document--it represents a deeply-felt, and deeply-shared 
set of attitudes about plagiarism. I disagree with much of the document but 
cannot deny its existence.




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Russ Hunt" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: Arguing that Plagiarism is an Ineffective tool


> Miriam says it just about right, I think: "I'm not convinced
> those job applicants that Rob referred to thought of it as
> plagiarizing.  I'm inclined they were trying to fit in in the
> same way that we ask our students to.  Hence, the same results."
>
> There's a good deal to be reflected on here; it's a way to
> illuminate, I think, just what our _students_ are trying to do.
> Interestingly, in trying to find the case I remembered from a
> couple of years ago, I stumbled on a nice review of a book
> which, among other things, clearly makes the case for the
> parallel between composing a teaching statement (for a portfolio
> or dossier) and producing that term paper.  The review is Jane
> Mathison Fife, "Changing the Contexts for Documenting our
> Teaching," _Pedagogy_ 5:1 (Winter 2005), 157-161, and the book
> is _Composition, Pedagogy, and the Scholarship of Teaching_, ed.
> Deborah Minter and Amy M. Goodburn (Boynton/Cook, 2002).
>
> I've now read the "information about Plagiarism" that the
> Waterloo letter said you should read "before starting your
> teaching dossier." (
> http://www.trace.uwaterloo.ca/tacerteach.html ). It's a
> fascinating document. It's directed to participants in the
> Waterloo Certificate in University Teaching, and it's a fairly
> sophisticated version of the sort of advice about ethics and
> plagiarism that universities regularly offer undergraduates. Its
> central focus is integrity and values, and it makes the usual
> move: yes, we all believe in integrity . . . but just in case,
> here are the draconian punishments for violating our rules.
>
> It also offers references for "how to avoid plagiarism," as
> pretty much all the anti-plagiarism documents I've read do. I
> was reminded that there's something extremely odd going on here.
>
> A document explaining "how to avoid" something would normally
> outline strategies for avoiding something that might _happen to
> you_. How to avoid being electrocuted, how to avoid being
> mugged, how to avoid eating contaminated food. No one writes
> documents giving strategies for avoiding stealing, or
> infanticide, or lying. If it's a matter of integrity it's not
> something that happens to you, is it?
>
> Seems to me there are mixed messages here -- just the kind we
> often hear in parent-to-kid discourse. Being bad is something
> you somehow "fall into." You're not "bad," you get corrupted.
> But you'll be punished for falling, anyway.
>
> I've said this before, so sorry if I'm boring people . . . but
> if I really cared about communicating with you, plagiarism would
> never occur to me. However, if I were in a situation where I had
> to produce discourse you'd approve of, and I had no investment
> in the relationship being mediated by the discourse, I'd do what
> was easiest. And if you said to me, as that letter does, "For
> almost all written submissions to the CUT Program (the exception
> being your research paper), no references are necessary, or even
> desirable.  We are primarily interested in your personal
> reflections on the subject matter of the workshop, panel,
> observation report, etc.," I would know that you are not, in
> fact, actually interested in my personal reflections at all:
> you're interested in whether my personal reflections are the
> kind you approve of.
>
> I would certainly, on the basis of that rubric, never think of
> explicitly bringing anybody else's ideas in (after all, you're
> interested only in what you can imagine comes out of my soul:
> "no references are . . . even desirable"). So I'd find something
> that I think you'd be impressed with, and I'd try to make sure -
> - if I thought you were checking -- that you couldn't find the
> source. Nothing about this would be about communication: it
> would be about producing an impressive text. To fit in.
>
> In that case, plagiarism would be a pretty effective tool. Just
> make sure no one saw you using it.
>
> Seems to me the problem, in both cases, is, as Miriam points
> out, the strange rhetorical situation the writer's in. Fife's
> review (and, it appears, even more the book, which I'm about to
> go find) talk about some ways to make the teacher's rhetorical
> situation more reasonable. They apply to what we ask students to
> write, as well.
>
> (Interesting as well that the Waterloo document is signed by
> Cathy Schryer -- though it says composed by a previous director
> of the service.  I wonder if Cathy can help us understand the
> genre we're working in here?)
>
> -- Russ
>
> St. Thomas University
> http://www.stu.ca/~hunt/
>
>                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
>  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
>         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]
>
> For the list archives and information about the organization,
>    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
>              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
>                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> 

                -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
  To leave the list, send a SIGNOFF CASLL command to
  [log in to unmask] or, if you experience difficulties,
         write to Russ Hunt at [log in to unmask]

For the list archives and information about the organization,
    its newsletter, and the annual conference, go to
              http://www.stu.ca/inkshed/
                 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
September 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011, Week 1
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.UTORONTO.CA

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager