In a message dated 8/28/2009 12:00:14 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

There is  1 message totalling 84 lines in this issue.

Topics of the  day:

1.  ROFLMAO

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To  sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:  
mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put:  signoff  parkinsn

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:   Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:01:08 +0200
From:    Nic Marais  <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: ROFLMAO

Roll On Floor  Laughing My Ass Off ;-)

Nic


On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:37 AM,  rayilynlee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> pls tell me  what  ROFLMAO means
> Rayilyn Brown
> Director AZNPF
>  Arizona Chapter National Parkinson Foundation
>  [log in to unmask]
>
>  --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Peggy  Willocks" <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 26,  2009 4:50 AM
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>  Subject: Re: PARKINSN Digest - 25 Aug 2009 (#2009-282)
>
>   Patti
>> I know this question will be answered several times, but I  had to 
chuckle
>> because I didn't know what it meant for ages, but  was afraid to ask.
>> IMHO means In My Humble Opinion.
>>  Now, who wants to tell her what ROFLMAO means?  LOL
>>  Peggy
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>  Date:    Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:46:39 -0500
>> From:   patti zapf <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: Re: a  thought
>>
>> Kathleen:
>> what does IMHO  mean?
>>
>> Patti
>>
>> -----Original  Message-----
>> From: Parkinson's Information Exchange  Network
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of  Kathleen Cochran
>> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 8:30 AM
>>  To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: a  thought
>>
>> Just a reminder: for many of us on this list,  "they"(PWP) = "us" ...a
>> highly
>> idiosyncratic, one size  does NOT fit all, us.
>>
>> I can only speak for myself, but  for me, a characterization of PWP as
>> "rigid
>> in their  thinking" is not helpful.
>>
>> No offense, Mary Ann. I  appreciate your contributions very much. :-)
>>
>> It's just  that-again, speaking only for myself-there's a fine line where
>>  caregiver discussions become counterproductive for PWP and IMHO we  are
>> skirting that line.
>>
>>  Kathleen
>>
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:
>>  [log in to unmask]
>> In the body of the message put:  signoff parkinsn
>>
>
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:
>  [log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff  parkinsn
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
To  sign-off Parkinsn send a message to:  
mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put:  signoff parkinsn

------------------------------

End of PARKINSN  Digest - 27 Aug 2009  (#2009-287)
************************************************



----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn