I wondered if it was something I said ! Bang their heads together till they sort it out.
 
> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:56:56 +0800
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> AOL is rejecting all listserv mail and the listserv automatically
> deletes subscribers membership when the rejections by a provider
> exceed 3 bounces.
>
> AOL DMARC security is the culprit. I suggest Innarellar take it up with them.
>
> http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/
>
> John Cottingham
> co-owner Parkinsn
>
> At 07:35 AM 7/6/2014, you wrote:
> >I have no idea, maybe John can help
> >From: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
> >Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 4:23 PM
> >To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >Hi Ray. I received this email yesterday and tried to respond but my
> >response wasn't allowed. Can you help me as to what went
> >wrong? Thanks. Roberta Innarella
> >
> >----------
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Sent: 7/5/2014 7:20:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
> >Subj: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 19:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
> >Subject: Fwd: Your removal from the PARKINSN list
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >Why have I received this email? Roberta Innarella
> >
> >
> >
> >____________________________________
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >Reply-to: [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Sent: 7/4/2014 12:00:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
> >Subj: Your removal from the PARKINSN list
> >
> >
> >Fri, 4 Jul 2014 00:00:16
> >
> >You have been automatically removed from the PARKINSN list (Parkinson's
> >Information Exchange Network) as a result of repeated delivery error
> >reports from your mail system. This decision was based on the automatic
> >error monitoring policy in effect for the list, and has not been reviewed
> >or otherwise confirmed by a human being. If you receive this message, it
> >means that something is wrong: while you are obviously able to receive
> >mail, your mail system has been regularly reporting that your account did
> >not exist, or that you were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail.
> >Here is some information which may assist you or your local help desk in
> >determining the cause of the problem:
> >
> >- The failing address is [log in to unmask]
> >
> >- The first error was reported on 2014-06-28.
> >
> >- Since then, a total of 3 delivery errors have been received.
> >
> >- The last reported error was: 5.0.0 521 (5.2.1 : [DMARC] This message
> >failed DMARC Evaluation and is being refused due to provided DMARC
> >Policy)
> >
> >PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you can of course re-subscribe
> >to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail
> >administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to
> >the PARKINSN list, and also affects your private mail. This means that
> >YOU HAVE PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write
> >to you during the same time frame will probably have received the same
> >errors for the same reason. The PARKINSN list is but one of the many
> >people who may have tried to write to you while your mail system was
> >malfunctioning.
> >
> >DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT THIS IS NORMAL. It is never
> >normal for a mail system to claim that a valid, working account does not
> >exist, just as it would not be normal for the post office to return some
> >of your mail with "addressee unknown" when the address was written
> >correctly. It is true that some mail systems are less reliable than
> >others, and your technical people may be doing the best they can with the
> >tools they have. But, ultimately, the level of service that you are
> >receiving is the result of a business decision, and not something due to
> >a universal technical limitation that one can only accept. Reliable mail
> >systems do exist, and it is ultimately up to you to decide whether this
> >level of service is acceptable or not.
> >
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn