Brian Collins:

Ohh POOH, Brian!  I think you're theory on colds is full of holes, at least
where us folks in the USA, are concerned.  WE don't get a lotta colds 'cause
we're not living on some piddly little island where it rains all time. <grin>


Heck... the reason we PWP in the USA don't get lotsa colds is we got TONS of
wide open spaces here so the germs can't get concentrated enough to develop
into colds! <giggle>

(Singing "Home, home on the range.... where the deer and the antelope plaaa a
a y... where seldom is heard a discouraaaaaging word and the skies are not
cloudy all day.") <--- Barb ain't into WAV files>

Barb Mallut
"Lil_Honey" on the Parkie Chat
[log in to unmask]  <----- P.S.  George L. THIS ain't no steeeenkin' "AD" fer
goodness sake!  It's a FREE-to-MSN-staff-members-ASSIGNED-email- address that
I had no choice in using, short of popping $$$ for an outside ISP each month.
Sheeesh!  And in mentioning my job, I use THAT for reference to back up a
comment I might make, not to advertise!  SO THERE!
(pouting prettily) GOT THAT <wink> B.


















----------
From:   PARKINSN: Parkinson's Disease - Information Exchange Network on behalf
of Brian Collins
Sent:   Saturday, December 28, 1996 4:39 PM
To:     Multiple recipients of list PARKINSN
Subject:        Re: PWP and Colds

 Subject:        PWP and Colds
>
> When I was first diagnosed with parkinsons 14 years ago, I read every thing
> that I could find in the local library on the subject.  One of the medical
> books that I read presented sort of a bad news/ good news format in
> explaining the pros and cons of having parkinson's desease.  One of the
> goods was that parkinson's patients almost never have colds. Another item
> listed was resistance to cancer.
>
> I have had sore throats since then but never have I gone into a full blown
> cold. I'm curious to know if anyone else has seen the reference? Where?  I
> have tried to locate it again and cannot.
>
> John Davis 59/14   [log in to unmask]
>
>

Hello John.  Re: resistance to colds, a month ago, I would probably have
agreed with you, because I had been cold-free for at least 5 years. Then,
just 4 weeks ago, I was knocked over by a real live full-blown cold, and it
took me between 2 and 3 weeks to recover. It makes a bit of a hole in the
theory regarding PD however.

An alternative explanation which makes sense to me, although I am not sure
if it is endorsed by the whole medical profession is as follows:

The common cold virus is capable of mutating, and our bodies, when exposed
to a new mutation, have to set into motion an impressive chemical lab.,
which eventually comes up with a cure for that particular mutation. The
effect of this process is what we call 'having a cold'.

The body stores the 'blueprint' for that anti-virus, so that if we encounter
it again, all our body has to do is dig it out and go into mass-production.
This takes a day or two, during which we may have sore throats, runny nose
etc. for a couple of days. This we call 'Fighting off a cold'.

Now for the good news bit: There are only so many ways in which the virus
can reconfigure itself - about 100 . So, since you can't catch the same cold
twice, as you get older, your chances of encountering one of the few viruses
to which you have no immunity are quite small. (NOT, however zero, as I
found out last month.

This theory sounds so sensible that I would love to know whether it has been
validated or rejected by the Medical profession. Any comments?  (I think
this is still relevant to the thread isn't it?)

Re: Amantadine: I am sure that a lot of folk taking Amantadine would like to
think that their freedom from colds (assuming that they have been free)  is
due to that drug, and it is true true that Amantadine was originally sold
as an anti-viral agent before the discovery that it could relieve some of
the early symptoms of PD. However, I cannot help thinking that if it really
is the magic cure for the cold, then the whole world would by now be taking
it, and they clearly are not.

Regards,
--
Brian Collins  <[log in to unmask]>