As a battle-scarred veteran of previous ListWars, I
agree with Nita. Time for a cease-fire.   Carole H.

--- Nita Andres <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Actually, not too long ago in Denver a place where
> these were kept frozen. Those
> that the parents did not claim were defrosted and
> discarded because the place ( I
> have not idea what to call it ) went out of
> business.
>
> This debate has gone on long enough. Nita
>
> William Heitman wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 9/17/99 11:31:23 AM Central
> Daylight Time,
> > [log in to unmask] writes:
> >
> > <<  each dismisses the
> >  others primary position (the humanity or
> otherwise of an embryo) as being
> >  ridiculous and then, claiming the moral high
> ground, proceeds to conduct the
> >  argument relevant to their own position.  With
> one side debating genocide
> >  and the other tissue transplants it's no wonder
> the debate is making no
> >  progress. >>
> >
> > I believe you are correct in this assessment.  The
> real question is:
> > Does fetal tissue (stem cells or other) drive
> abortion?  If the answer to
> > that question is or can be made to be no, I
> believe nobody will argue that
> > flushing or incinerating the tissue rather than
> using it in transplants is
> > the superior moral position.
> >
> > WHH 56/38/37
>


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com