I wondered if it was something I said !  Bang their heads together till they sort it out.
 
> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:56:56 +0800
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Fw: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> To: [log in to unmask]
> 
> AOL is rejecting all listserv mail and the listserv automatically 
> deletes subscribers membership when the rejections by a provider 
> exceed 3 bounces.
> 
> AOL DMARC security is the culprit. I suggest Innarellar take it up with them.
> 
> http://postmaster-blog.aol.com/2014/04/22/aol-mail-updates-dmarc-policy-to-reject/
> 
> John Cottingham
> co-owner Parkinsn
> 
> At 07:35 AM 7/6/2014, you wrote:
> >I have no idea, maybe John can help
> >From: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
> >Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2014 4:23 PM
> >To: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
> >Subject: Fwd: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >Hi Ray.  I received this email yesterday and tried to respond but my 
> >response wasn't allowed.  Can you help me as to what went 
> >wrong?  Thanks. Roberta Innarella
> >
> >----------
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Sent: 7/5/2014 7:20:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time
> >Subj: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From:    [log in to unmask]
> >Date:    Sat, 5 Jul 2014 19:20:36 -0400 (EDT)
> >Subject: Fwd: Your removal from the PARKINSN list
> >To:    [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >Why have I received this email?  Roberta Innarella
> >
> >
> >
> >____________________________________
> >From: [log in to unmask]
> >Reply-to:  [log in to unmask]
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Sent:  7/4/2014 12:00:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time
> >Subj: Your removal from the  PARKINSN list
> >
> >
> >Fri, 4 Jul 2014 00:00:16
> >
> >You have been   automatically removed from the  PARKINSN list  (Parkinson's
> >Information  Exchange Network)  as a  result  of  repeated delivery  error
> >reports from your  mail system.  This decision was based  on the automatic
> >error monitoring policy in  effect for the list, and has not been reviewed
> >or otherwise confirmed by a  human  being. If you receive this message, it
> >means that   something is wrong: while  you are obviously able  to  receive
> >mail, your mail system has been regularly reporting that your  account did
> >not exist, or that you were otherwise permanently unable to  receive mail.
> >Here is some information which may assist  you or your  local help desk in
> >determining the cause of the problem:
> >
> >- The  failing address is [log in to unmask]
> >
> >- The first error was reported  on 2014-06-28.
> >
> >- Since then, a total of 3 delivery errors have been  received.
> >
> >- The  last reported error was:  5.0.0 521 (5.2.1  :  [DMARC] This message
> >failed  DMARC Evaluation  and   is  being refused  due  to provided   DMARC
> >Policy)
> >
> >PLEASE DO NOT  IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you  can  of course re-subscribe
> >to the list, it is important for  you  to report this problem to your mail
> >administrator so that  it can be  solved. This problem  is not specific to
> >the PARKINSN  list, and  also affects  your private mail. This  means that
> >YOU HAVE  PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE  MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write
> >to  you  during the same time  frame will probably have  received  the same
> >errors for  the same  reason. The PARKINSN  list is  but  one of  the many
> >people who  may have  tried to  write  to you while  your mail  system  was
> >malfunctioning.
> >
> >DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT  THIS IS NORMAL. It is never
> >normal for a mail system to claim  that a  valid, working account does not
> >exist, just as it would not be  normal  for the post office to return some
> >of  your mail  with   "addressee  unknown" when  the  address was   written
> >correctly.  It is  true that  some mail   systems are  less reliable  than
> >others, and your technical  people may be doing the best they can with the
> >tools  they have.   But, ultimately,  the level  of service  that you   are
> >receiving is the result of a  business decision, and not something  due to
> >a universal technical limitation that  one can only accept.  Reliable mail
> >systems do exist, and  it is ultimately up to you   to decide whether this
> >level of service is acceptable or  not.
> >
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> >In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
> In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn
 		 	   		  
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To sign-off Parkinsn send a message to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
In the body of the message put: signoff parkinsn